Constraint is modest in the mass public — and far higher among the informed
Belief-system constraint (mean absolute correlation among the oriented issue scales) by year, split into three sophistication terciles. Higher means issue positions travel together. Shaded bands mark the early (1972–1984) and recent (2012–2024) comparison windows.
Takeaway: the high-knowledge line sits durably above the low-knowledge line across the whole half-century, and the gap between them never closes — ideology is structured for the few, loose for the many.
The same issues, two different publics
Issue-by-issue absolute correlations among the seven oriented scales, pooled 2012–2024. Darker squares mean the two positions move together more tightly. Left: the high-sophistication public. Right: the low-sophistication public.
Takeaway: the informed public's matrix is dense and dark — its issues form a single web — while the inattentive public's is pale, its positions only loosely related to one another.
High sophistication · mean |r| = 0.488
Low sophistication · mean |r| = 0.299
Do conservatives hold conservative positions? Mostly, if they are paying attention
Share of each sophistication tercile whose issue positions are “ideologically consistent” with their own liberal–conservative self-placement, by year. Higher means symbolic label and operational positions line up.
Takeaway: across every year the informed public's label matches its positions far more often than the inattentive public's — the gap is wide early and, even as both rise, never closes.