From autonomy to obedience, intolerance rises
Weighted share naming each group as unwanted neighbours, and the share counted socially conservative, by authoritarian child-rearing index. Each country counts once; the curves average across the 108.
Takeaway: the homosexuals line and the social-conservatism line climb steeply from left to right; the racial and immigrant lines tilt up only gently — the steep rise is carried by the sexuality and social-conservatism measures.
The disposition predicts social conservatism everywhere; the label does not
One dot per country. Horizontal: correlation of the authoritarian index with left–right self-placement. Vertical: its correlation with the social-conservatism index. Colored by region.
Takeaway: the cloud sits high on the vertical axis — authoritarian child-rearing predicts social conservatism almost everywhere — but is smeared across the horizontal one, because its tie to the left–right label is weak and inconsistent. Most dots lie above the diagonal.
Approval of authoritarian rule climbs with the disposition
Mean approval of two non-democratic systems (1 = very bad to 4 = very good), by authoritarian child-rearing index, pooled across countries.
Takeaway: both lines slope upward from the autonomy pole to the obedience pole — the obedience-minded approve of strong-man and army rule more than the autonomy-minded do, the army-rule line rising the more steeply of the two.